arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2202.13758cs.CLcs.AIcs.CYcs.LGcs.LO

Logical Fallacy Detection

Max Planck Institute(马克斯·普朗克研究所);ETH Zürich(苏黎世联邦理工学院);BITS Pilani(博拉理工学院);IIT Kharagpur(印度理工学院克勒格布尔分校);Saarland Informatics Campus(萨尔兰信息学园区);University of Michigan(密歇根大学);University of Hong Kong(香港大学)

Zhijing Jin, Abhinav Lalwani, Tejas Vaidhya, Xiaoyu Shen, Yiwen Ding, Zhiheng Lyu, Mrinmaya Sachan, Rada Mihalcea, Bernhard Schölkopf

英文摘要:

Reasoning is central to human intelligence. However, fallacious arguments are common, and some exacerbate problems such as spreading misinformation about climate change. In this paper, we propose the task of logical fallacy detection, and provide a new dataset (Logic) of logical fallacies generally found in text, together with an additional challenge set for detecting logical fallacies in climate change claims (LogicClimate). Detecting logical fallacies is a hard problem as the model must understand the underlying logical structure of the argument. We find that existing pretrained large language models perform poorly on this task. In contrast, we show that a simple structure-aware classifier outperforms the best language model by 5.46% on Logic and 4.51% on LogicClimate. We encourage future work to explore this task as (a) it can serve as a new reasoning challenge for language models, and (b) it can have potential applications in tackling the spread of misinformation. Our dataset and code are available at https://github.com/causalNLP/logical-fallacy

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑