arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2202.08792cs.CYcs.AIcs.HC
收藏

Seeing Like a Toolkit: How Toolkits Envision the Work of AI Ethics

Georgia Institute of Technology(佐治亚理工学院);Microsoft Research(微软研究院);University of California, Berkeley(加州大学伯克利分校)

Richmond Y. Wong, Michael A. Madaio, Nick Merrill

英文摘要:

Numerous toolkits have been developed to support ethical AI development. However, toolkits, like all tools, encode assumptions in their design about what work should be done and how. In this paper, we conduct a qualitative analysis of 27 AI ethics toolkits to critically examine how the work of ethics is imagined and how it is supported by these toolkits. Specifically, we examine the discourses toolkits rely on when talking about ethical issues, who they imagine should do the work of ethics, and how they envision the work practices involved in addressing ethics. Among the toolkits, we identify a mismatch between the imagined work of ethics and the support the toolkits provide for doing that work. In particular, we identify a lack of guidance around how to navigate labor, organizational, and institutional power dynamics as they relate to performing ethical work. We use these omissions to chart future work for researchers and designers of AI ethics toolkits.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑