Facebook-Cambridge Analytica数据丑闻后信息隐私担忧的地区差异
Regional Differences in Information Privacy Concerns After the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica Data Scandal
摘要：
虽然全球对数据隐私的关注越来越多，但他们目前的大部分理论理解都是基于在少数国家进行的研究。以前的工作认为，人们的文化背景可能会塑造他们的隐私问题，因此，我们可以期待来自世界不同地区的人以不同的方式来概念化他们。我们收集并分析了西班牙语和英语中关于#CambridgeAnalytica丑闻的大规模推文数据集，以开始探索这一假设。我们采用了词嵌入和定性分析，以确定哪些信息隐私的关注，并强调这些问题的语言和地区差异的特点。我们的研究结果表明，相关的概念，如法规，可以添加到当前的信息隐私框架。我们还注意到，英文版的数据汇集比西班牙文版的更为重要。此外，与所研究的其他区域相比，北美的数据显示出对意识的关注范围较窄。我们的研究结果需要更多样化的数据来源和对全球数据隐私问题的细致分析。
英文摘要：
While there is increasing global attention to data privacy, most of their current theoretical understanding is based on research conducted in a few countries. Prior work argues that people's cultural backgrounds might shape their privacy concerns; thus, we could expect people from different world regions to conceptualize them in diverse ways. We collected and analyzed a large-scale dataset of tweets about the #CambridgeAnalytica scandal in Spanish and English to start exploring this hypothesis. We employed word embeddings and qualitative analysis to identify which information privacy concerns are present and characterize language and regional differences in emphasis on these concerns. Our results suggest that related concepts, such as regulations, can be added to current information privacy frameworks. We also observe a greater emphasis on data collection in English than in Spanish. Additionally, data from North America exhibits a narrower focus on awareness compared to other regions under study. Our results call for more diverse sources of data and nuanced analysis of data privacy concerns around the globe.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
