对“评”四元数物理空间模型中的贝尔定理与局部实在论“一文的答复
Reply to "Comment on 'Bell's Theorem Versus Local Realism in a Quaternionic Model of Physical Space'"
摘要：
在这篇论文中，我回应了对我以前在这本杂志上发表的一篇论文的批评，题为“贝尔定理与物理空间四元数模型中的局部实在论”。“那篇论文提出了一个基于四元数3球的量子关联的局部现实模型，作为一个物理空间，我们被限制在其中进行所有的实验。另一方面，批评认为在平坦的欧几里得空间中有两个完全不同的模型，它们都与我的四元数三球模型无关。然后，它批评了自己的平面空间模型，并声称它因此批评了我的论文中提出的模型。一路上，没有提供证据或证明，它声称我的论文中的结果是基于错误的。我证明我的论文中没有任何错误。相反，我从批评和它所依赖的批评中提出了一些基本的数学和概念错误。
英文摘要：
In this paper, I respond to a critique of one of my papers previously published in this journal, entitled "Bell's Theorem Versus Local Realism in a Quaternionic Model of Physical Space." That paper presents a local-realistic model of quantum correlations based on a quaternionic 3-sphere, taken as a physical space in which we are confined to perform all our experiments. The critique, on the other hand, considers two entirely different models within a flat Euclidean space, neither related to my quaternionic 3-sphere model. It then criticizes its own flat space models and claims that it has thereby criticized the model presented in my paper. Along the way, without providing evidence or proof, it claims that the results in my paper are based on mistakes. I demonstrate that there are no mistakes of any kind in my paper. On the contrary, I bring out a number of elementary mathematical and conceptual mistakes from the critique and the critiques it relies on.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
