arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2202.02776cs.AIcs.CYcs.HCcs.LG
收藏

AI系统的人权、民主和法治保障框架:一项提案

Human rights, democracy, and the rule of law assurance framework for AI systems: A proposal

David Leslie, Christopher Burr, Mhairi Aitken, Michael Katell, Morgan Briggs, Cami Rincon

摘要:

继2020年12月发表可行性研究后,欧洲委员会的人工智能特设委员会(CAHAI)及其小组开始努力制定和起草基于欧洲委员会的《人工智能法律框架的可能要素》人权、民主和法治标准。该文件最终于2021年12月由CAHAI全体会议通过。为了支持这一努力,艾伦·图灵研究所开展了一项研究计划,探索将人权尽职调查与可靠的人工智能创新实践相结合所需的治理流程和实用工具。由此产生的框架已于2021年9月完成并提交给欧洲委员会。它提出了一种端到端的方法来保证人工智能项目的生命周期,将基于上下文的风险分析和适当的利益相关者参与与全面的影响评估,透明的风险管理,影响缓解和创新保证实践相结合。这些相互关联的进程合在一起构成了人权、民主和法治保障框架。HUDERAF将基于原则的人权尽职调查的程序要求与为负责任和值得信赖的人工智能创新实践建立技术和社会技术护栏所需的治理机制相结合。其目的是提供一套方便易用的机制,以促进遵守基于欧洲委员会人权、民主和法治标准的具有约束力的人工智能法律框架,并确保人工智能创新项目在适当的公共问责、透明度和民主治理水平下进行。

英文摘要:

Following on from the publication of its Feasibility Study in December 2020, the Council of Europe's Ad Hoc Committee on Artificial Intelligence (CAHAI) and its subgroups initiated efforts to formulate and draft its Possible Elements of a Legal Framework on Artificial Intelligence, based on the Council of Europe's standards on human rights, democracy, and the rule of law. This document was ultimately adopted by the CAHAI plenary in December 2021. To support this effort, The Alan Turing Institute undertook a programme of research that explored the governance processes and practical tools needed to operationalise the integration of human right due diligence with the assurance of trustworthy AI innovation practices. The resulting framework was completed and submitted to the Council of Europe in September 2021. It presents an end-to-end approach to the assurance of AI project lifecycles that integrates context-based risk analysis and appropriate stakeholder engagement with comprehensive impact assessment, and transparent risk management, impact mitigation, and innovation assurance practices. Taken together, these interlocking processes constitute a Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law Assurance Framework (HUDERAF). The HUDERAF combines the procedural requirements for principles-based human rights due diligence with the governance mechanisms needed to set up technical and socio-technical guardrails for responsible and trustworthy AI innovation practices. Its purpose is to provide an accessible and user-friendly set of mechanisms for facilitating compliance with a binding legal framework on artificial intelligence, based on the Council of Europe's standards on human rights, democracy, and the rule of law, and to ensure that AI innovation projects are carried out with appropriate levels of public accountability, transparency, and democratic governance.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑