arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2202.01164astro-ph.EPphysics.hist-ph
收藏

AD 363?

Unprecedented Daylight Display of Kreutz Sungrazers in AD 363?

Zdenek Sekanina

摘要:

在最近提出的接触二进制模型(Sekanina 2021)的背景下,我调查的情况下,第一近日点通过的克鲁兹掠日者在轨道上的重心周期近735年,以下的初始近远日点分裂的假定的祖先,亚里士多德的彗星的372 BC。考虑到这次分裂的有利条件以及随后的二次碎裂事件,碎片应该几乎同时到达它们的第一个近日点,这让人想起了两个超碎片模型在公元356年的近日点回归的预期结果(Sekanina & Chodas 2004)。一群克罗伊茨掠日者的相关案例被审查,以评估罗马历史学家阿米亚努斯·马塞利努斯(Ammianus Marcellinus)在公元363年末(仅7年后)的简短评论可能产生的科学后果。测试的场景与阿米阿努斯的叙述并不矛盾,也与接触双星模型一致,包括一组在白天可见的10颗掠日星,它们都在4.6天内到达近日点。作为这项工作的一部分,我评论的作用迅速发展,辉煌的后近日点尾巴;修订视星等典型的第一次和最后一次裸眼观测;比较能见度条件在全白天,在黄昏,在晚上;而且,第一次提出了间接证据,支持彗星X/1106 C1是C/1843 D1的母彗星,而不是C/1882 R1和C/1965 S1。

英文摘要:

In the context of the recently proposed contact-binary model (Sekanina 2021), I investigate the circumstances of the first perihelion passage of the Kreutz sungrazers in orbits with barycentric periods near 735 yr, following the initial near-aphelion splitting of the presumed progenitor, Aristotle's comet of 372 BC. Given favorable conditions at this breakup and at episodes of secondary fragmentation in its aftermath, the fragments should have arrived at their first perihelion nearly simultaneously, reminiscent of the anticipated outcome for the two-superfragment model's perihelion return of AD 356 (Sekanina & Chodas 2004). The relevant case of a swarm of Kreutz sungrazers is examined to appraise possible scientific ramifications of the brief remark by Ammianus Marcellinus, a Roman historian, that "in broad daylight comets were seen" in late AD 363, only seven years later. The tested scenario, which does not contradict Ammianus' narrative and is consistent with the contact-binary model, involves a set of ten sungrazers visible in the daytime, all reaching perihelion over a period of 4.6 days. As part of this work, I comment on the role of the rapidly developing, brilliant post-perihelion tail; revise the apparent magnitude typical for the first and last naked-eye sightings; compare the visibility conditions in full daylight, in twilight, and at night; and, for the first time, present circumstantial evidence that favors comet X/1106 C1 as the parent to C/1843 D1 rather than to C/1882 R1 and C/1965 S1.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑