arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2202.00520math.NAcs.DScs.NA
收藏

非线性规划的精确矩阵分解更新

Exact Matrix Factorization Updates for Nonlinear Programming

Adolfo R. Escobedo

摘要:

LU和Cholesky矩阵分解算法是用于求解在解决最优化问题时遇到的线性方程组(SLE)的核心子例程。标准分解式算法是高效的,但仍然容易受到循环误差的积累,这可能导致求解器返回实际上无效的可行性和最优性声明。本文介绍了一种新的方法来解决序列密切相关的线性方程组遇到的非线性规划有效和无循环误差。具体来说,它介绍了一阶更新算法的舍入误差无(REF)因式分解框架,一个工具集建立在整数保持算法,导致了故障证明SLE解决方案子例程的开发和实施线性规划。所提出的算法的正式保证,建立通过推导的理论见解。它们的优势得到了计算实验的支持,实验证明,在具有超过一百万个条目的完全稠密矩阵上,精确因式分解运行时间的改进高达75倍。该方法的一个显着的优点是,通过所提出的算法计算的任何系数的长度是有界的多项式的输入的大小,而不必求助于最大公因数操作,这是所需的,从而阻碍了一个有效的实现精确的合理的算术方法。

英文摘要:

LU and Cholesky matrix factorization algorithms are core subroutines used to solve systems of linear equations (SLEs) encountered while solving an optimization problem. Standard factorization algorithms are highly efficient but remain susceptible to the accumulation of roundoff errors, which can lead solvers to return feasibility and optimality claims that are actually invalid. This paper introduces a novel approach for solving sequences of closely related SLEs encountered in nonlinear programming efficiently and without roundoff errors. Specifically, it introduces rank-one update algorithms for the roundoff-error-free (REF) factorization framework, a toolset built on integer-preserving arithmetic that has led to the development and implementation of fail-proof SLE solution subroutines for linear programming. The formal guarantees of the proposed algorithms are established through the derivation of theoretical insights. Their advantages are supported with computational experiments, which demonstrate upwards of 75x-improvements over exact factorization run-times on fully dense matrices with over one million entries. A significant advantage of the methodology is that the length of any coefficient calculated via the proposed algorithms is bounded polynomially in the size of the inputs without having to resort to greatest common divisor operations, which are required by and thereby hinder an efficient implementation of exact rational arithmetic approaches.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑