arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2201.12662cs.IRcs.AIcs.GT

Fair ranking: a critical review, challenges, and future directions

IIT Kharagpur(印度理工学院卡哈拉格普尔分校);L3S Research Center(L3S研究中心);Universitat Pompeu Fabra(庞培法布拉大学);Competition and Markets Authority(竞争与市场管理局);Accenture Plc(埃森哲公司);Zalando Research(Zalando研究);Max Planck Institute for Software Systems(马克斯·普朗克软件系统研究所);Cornell Tech(康奈尔科技学院)

Gourab K Patro, Lorenzo Porcaro, Laura Mitchell, Qiuyue Zhang, Meike Zehlike, Nikhil Garg

英文摘要:

Ranking, recommendation, and retrieval systems are widely used in online platforms and other societal systems, including e-commerce, media-streaming, admissions, gig platforms, and hiring. In the recent past, a large "fair ranking" research literature has been developed around making these systems fair to the individuals, providers, or content that are being ranked. Most of this literature defines fairness for a single instance of retrieval, or as a simple additive notion for multiple instances of retrievals over time. This work provides a critical overview of this literature, detailing the often context-specific concerns that such an approach misses: the gap between high ranking placements and true provider utility, spillovers and compounding effects over time, induced strategic incentives, and the effect of statistical uncertainty. We then provide a path forward for a more holistic and impact-oriented fair ranking research agenda, including methodological lessons from other fields and the role of the broader stakeholder community in overcoming data bottlenecks and designing effective regulatory environments.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑