《自然》586，373（2020）评论Snider等人"
Reply to "Comment on Nature 586, 373 (2020) by E. Snider et al."
摘要：
在本文中，我们回应了最近由Hirsch和van der Marel在arXiv（3）上提出的对我们在CSH（1，2）上的工作的批评。我们指出，他们的非同行评议的批评（3）源于缺乏科学理解或未能适当分析原始数据。我们解释说，使用他们的“Unwrapped”方法是不适当的。(3)我们提出科学证据，证明他们的方法中使用的这种基本和根本的失败导致了参考文献（3）中提出的错误陈述。我们还注意到，在Hirsch和van der Marel在arXiv上发表他们的评论之前，Hirsch可以获得参考文献（1，2）的原始数据。(3)我们支持参考文献（1，2）的发现和结论，并继续致力于科学研究的完整性。
英文摘要：
In this paper, we respond to a recent criticism of our work on CSH, (1,2) raised by Hirsch and van der Marel on the arXiv (3). We point out that their non-peer reviewed critique (3) stems from either a lack of scientific understanding or a failure to appropriately analyze raw data. We explain that the use of their "Unwrapped" method was inappropriately performed. (3) We present scientific evidence that this basic and fundamental failure used in their method results in the false representations set forth in Ref (3). We also note that the raw data of Refs (1,2) were made available to Hirsch before he and van der Marel posted their comments on the arXiv. (3) We stand by the findings and conclusions of Refs (1,2) and remain committed to the integrity in scientific research.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
