arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2201.11308cs.CRcs.ITmath.IT
收藏

同行评议中的隐私校准

Calibration with Privacy in Peer Review

Wenxin Ding, Gautam Kamath, Weina Wang, Nihar B. Shah

摘要:

同行评审中的评审员经常被错误校准:他们可能是严格的,宽松的,极端的,温和的,等等。然而,这种校准的尝试可能会泄露关于哪个评论者评论了哪篇论文的敏感信息。在本文中,我们确定了这个问题的校准与隐私,并提供了一个基本的构建块来解决it.Specifically,我们提出了一个理论研究这个问题下的简化但具有挑战性的模型,涉及两个评论家,两篇论文,和MAP计算对手。我们的主要研究结果建立了隐私(防止对手推断审稿人身份)和效用(接受更好的论文)之间的权衡的帕累托边界,并设计了明确的计算效率的算法,我们证明是帕累托最优的。

英文摘要:

Reviewers in peer review are often miscalibrated: they may be strict, lenient, extreme, moderate, etc. A number of algorithms have previously been proposed to calibrate reviews. Such attempts of calibration can however leak sensitive information about which reviewer reviewed which paper. In this paper, we identify this problem of calibration with privacy, and provide a foundational building block to address it. Specifically, we present a theoretical study of this problem under a simplified-yet-challenging model involving two reviewers, two papers, and an MAP-computing adversary. Our main results establish the Pareto frontier of the tradeoff between privacy (preventing the adversary from inferring reviewer identity) and utility (accepting better papers), and design explicit computationally-efficient algorithms that we prove are Pareto optimal.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑