基于LCOE的DLT本地能源交易平台定价
LCOE-based Pricing for DLT-enabled Local Energy Trading Platforms
摘要：
多年来，像上网电价（FiT）这样的支持计划一直是分布式能源部署以及从消费主义向生产消费主义过渡的重要推动力。能源系统的民主化和脱碳化为系统运营商带来了挑战和机遇，为当地能源市场等新兴概念铺平了道路。FiT方法通常被认为是生产消费者参与此类市场意愿的经济下限，但现在在几个国家正在逐步淘汰。本文提出了一种基于平准化电力成本的新定价机制，旨在确保生产消费者的盈利能力，并为所有市场参与者创造透明和公平的价格。该机制旨在基于分布式账本技术的平台上运行，并从整体角度进一步建立，将市场框架定义为网络-物理-社会系统中的互动。基于固定和可变合同与批发供应商的计划进行了分析，并与传统的FiT和其拟议的替代方案进行了比较。结果显示，与FiT计划相比，消费者的成本降低，生产者的收入略有损失。然而，将其与实际建议的FiT替代品进行比较，很明显，本研究中提出的定价机制为生产者和消费者提供了大幅增加的利益。
英文摘要：
Support schemes like the Feed-in-Tariff (FiT) have for many years been an important driver for the deployment of distributed energy resources, and the transition from consumerism to prosumerism. This democratization and decarbonization of the energy system has led to both challenges and opportunities for the system operators, paving the way for emerging concepts like local energy markets. The FiT approach has often been assumed as the lower economic bound for a prosumer's willingness to participate in such markets but is now being phased out in several countries. In this paper, a new pricing mechanism based on the Levelized Cost of Electricity is proposed, with the intention of securing profitability for the prosumers, as well as creating a transparent and fair price for all market participants. The mechanism is designed to function on a Distributed Ledger Technology-based platform and is further set up from a holistic perspective, defining the market framework as interactions in a Cyber-Physical-Social-System. Schemes based on both fixed and variable contracts with the wholesale supplier are analyzed and compared with both the conventional FiT and to its proposed replacement options. The results show a cost reduction for the consumers and a slight loss in revenue for the prosumers compared to the FiT scheme. Comparing it to the actual suggested replacements to the FiT, however, it is clear that the pricing mechanism proposed in this study provides a substantial increase of benefits for both prosumers and consumers.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
