arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2201.07409cs.LGcs.SI

Dual Space Graph Contrastive Learning

University of Technology Sydney(悉尼科技大学);Monash University(莫纳什大学);Wuhan University of Technology(武汉理工大学);University of Illinois at Chicago(伊利诺伊大学芝加哥分校)

Haoran Yang, Hongxu Chen, Shirui Pan, Lin Li, Philip S. Yu, Guandong Xu

英文摘要:

Unsupervised graph representation learning has emerged as a powerful tool to address real-world problems and achieves huge success in the graph learning domain. Graph contrastive learning is one of the unsupervised graph representation learning methods, which recently attracts attention from researchers and has achieved state-of-the-art performances on various tasks. The key to the success of graph contrastive learning is to construct proper contrasting pairs to acquire the underlying structural semantics of the graph. However, this key part is not fully explored currently, most of the ways generating contrasting pairs focus on augmenting or perturbating graph structures to obtain different views of the input graph. But such strategies could degrade the performances via adding noise into the graph, which may narrow down the field of the applications of graph contrastive learning. In this paper, we propose a novel graph contrastive learning method, namely \textbf{D}ual \textbf{S}pace \textbf{G}raph \textbf{C}ontrastive (DSGC) Learning, to conduct graph contrastive learning among views generated in different spaces including the hyperbolic space and the Euclidean space. Since both spaces have their own advantages to represent graph data in the embedding spaces, we hope to utilize graph contrastive learning to bridge the spaces and leverage advantages from both sides. The comparison experiment results show that DSGC achieves competitive or better performances among all the datasets. In addition, we conduct extensive experiments to analyze the impact of different graph encoders on DSGC, giving insights about how to better leverage the advantages of contrastive learning between different spaces.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑