arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2201.06410astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph
收藏

空间平坦宇宙的初始能量——其可能起源的线索

Initial Energy of a Spatially Flat Universe -- a Hint of its Possible Origin

Fulvio Melia

AI总结:

本文探讨了空间平坦宇宙的初始能量特征,指出其动能与引力能之和为零但总能量非零,并分析了这一特征对宇宙可能起源于量子涨落的重要影响。

摘要:

宇宙大爆炸起源的证据确实令人信服,尽管其起因仍完全是个谜。然而,随着宇宙时空以前所未有的细节向我们展现,我们开始细化其可能初始条件的范围——至少在当前物理理论的框架内。宇宙似乎是空间平坦的,在此我们以清晰、直白的方式讨论为何这一特征意味着一个动能与引力能之和为零的宇宙,尽管其总能量显然不为零。由于宇宙可能作为量子涨落开始其存在,这一结果具有深远的影响。这是从“虚无”中产生的,还是从预先存在的真空中产生的?非零的总能量似乎会排除前一种情景,但不一定排除后一种情景,尽管这会引发一个问题:具有非零能量的涨落如何能存活足够长的时间,或经典化,以至于我们在135亿年后还能看到它。因此,对宇宙空间曲率的高精度测量可能构成影响可能量子起源的第一项确凿证据。

英文摘要:

The evidence for a Big Bang origin of the Universe is truly compelling, though its cause remains a complete mystery. As the cosmic spacetime is revealed to us with ever improving detail, however, we are beginning to refine the range of its possible initial conditions -- at least within the framework of current physical theories. The Universe, it seems, is spatially flat, and here we discuss in clear, straightforward terms why this trait implies a cosmos with zero kinetic plus gravitational energy, though apparently not zero total energy. Such an outcome has far reaching consequences because of the possibility that the Universe may have begun its existence as a quantum fluctuation. Was this from `nothing,' or perhaps a pre-existing vacuum? A non-zero total energy would seemingly preclude the former scenario, but not necessarily the latter, though this would then raise the question of how a fluctuation with non-zero energy could have lived long enough, or classicalized, for us to see it 13.5 billion years later. The high-precision measurement of the Universe's spatial curvature may thus constitute the first tangible piece of evidence impacting a possible quantum beginning.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑