arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2201.05745cs.LGcs.AIeess.SP
收藏

SPD流形上用于域自适应的深度最优传输

Deep Optimal Transport for Domain Adaptation on SPD Manifolds

College of Computing and Data Science, Nanyang Technological University(计算与数据科学学院,南洋理工大学);Université Paris-Saclay, Inria, CEA, Palaiseau, France(巴黎-萨克雷大学,法国国家信息与自动化技术研究所,法国原子能委员会,Palaiseau)

Ce Ju, Cuntai Guan

AI总结:

本文提出一种结合最优传输与SPD流形几何的域自适应框架,在三个跨会话脑机接口数据集上验证其能有效减少分布差异并优于基线方法。

摘要:

几何深度学习的最新进展使机器学习界对对称正定(SPD)流形上的域自适应问题日益关注,尤其是对于经常遭受跨会话分布偏移影响的神经影像数据。这类数据通常表示为脑信号的协方差矩阵,由于其对称性和正定性,本质上位于SPD流形上。然而,传统的域自适应方法在直接应用于协方差矩阵时往往忽略这种几何结构,这可能导致性能欠佳。为解决这一问题,我们提出了一种新的几何深度学习框架,该框架将最优传输理论与SPD流形的几何结构相结合。我们的方法在对齐数据分布的同时尊重流形结构,有效减少了边缘差异和条件差异。我们在三个跨会话脑机接口数据集KU、BNCI2014001和BNCI2015001上验证了所提方法,结果表明该方法在保持数据内在几何结构的同时,始终优于基线方法。我们还提供了定量结果和可视化,以更好地说明所学嵌入的行为。

英文摘要:

Recent progress in geometric deep learning has drawn increasing attention from the machine learning community toward domain adaptation on symmetric positive definite (SPD) manifolds, especially for neuroimaging data that often suffer from distribution shifts across sessions. These data, typically represented as covariance matrices of brain signals, inherently lie on SPD manifolds due to their symmetry and positive definiteness. However, conventional domain adaptation methods often overlook this geometric structure when applied directly to covariance matrices, which can result in suboptimal performance. To address this issue, we introduce a new geometric deep learning framework that combines optimal transport theory with the geometry of SPD manifolds. Our approach aligns data distributions while respecting the manifold structure, effectively reducing both marginal and conditional discrepancies. We validate our method on three cross-session brain computer interface datasets, KU, BNCI2014001, and BNCI2015001, where it consistently outperforms baseline approaches while maintaining the intrinsic geometry of the data. We also provide quantitative results and visualizations to better illustrate the behavior of the learned embeddings.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑