arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2201.03829cs.CL
收藏

Quantifying Robustness to Adversarial Word Substitutions

Key Lab of Intelligent Information Processing, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences(中国科学院计算技术研究所智能信息处理重点实验室);University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(中国科学院大学);State Key Laboratory of Computer Science, Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences(中国科学院软件研究所计算机科学国家重点实验室);Laboratory of Parallel Software and Computational Science, ISCAS(中国科学院软件研究所并行软件与计算科学实验室);Institute of Computing and Intelligence, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen)(哈尔滨工业大学(深圳)计算与智能研究院)

Yuting Yang, Pei Huang, FeiFei Ma, Juan Cao, Meishan Zhang, Jian Zhang, Jintao Li

英文摘要:

Deep-learning-based NLP models are found to be vulnerable to word substitution perturbations. Before they are widely adopted, the fundamental issues of robustness need to be addressed. Along this line, we propose a formal framework to evaluate word-level robustness. First, to study safe regions for a model, we introduce robustness radius which is the boundary where the model can resist any perturbation. As calculating the maximum robustness radius is computationally hard, we estimate its upper and lower bound. We repurpose attack methods as ways of seeking upper bound and design a pseudo-dynamic programming algorithm for a tighter upper bound. Then verification method is utilized for a lower bound. Further, for evaluating the robustness of regions outside a safe radius, we reexamine robustness from another view: quantification. A robustness metric with a rigorous statistical guarantee is introduced to measure the quantification of adversarial examples, which indicates the model's susceptibility to perturbations outside the safe radius. The metric helps us figure out why state-of-the-art models like BERT can be easily fooled by a few word substitutions, but generalize well in the presence of real-world noises.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑