arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2201.01787cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
收藏

Does Entity Abstraction Help Generative Transformers Reason?

Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute (Mila)(魁北克人工智能研究所(Mila));Polytechnique Montreal(蒙特利尔理工学院);ServiceNow Research(ServiceNow研究院);McGill University(麦吉尔大学)

Nicolas Gontier, Siva Reddy, Christopher Pal

英文摘要:

We study the utility of incorporating entity type abstractions into pre-trained Transformers and test these methods on four NLP tasks requiring different forms of logical reasoning: (1) compositional language understanding with text-based relational reasoning (CLUTRR), (2) abductive reasoning (ProofWriter), (3) multi-hop question answering (HotpotQA), and (4) conversational question answering (CoQA). We propose and empirically explore three ways to add such abstraction: (i) as additional input embeddings, (ii) as a separate sequence to encode, and (iii) as an auxiliary prediction task for the model. Overall, our analysis demonstrates that models with abstract entity knowledge performs better than without it. The best abstraction aware models achieved an overall accuracy of 88.8% and 91.8% compared to the baseline model achieving 62.9% and 89.8% on CLUTRR and ProofWriter respectively. However, for HotpotQA and CoQA, we find that F1 scores improve by only 0.5% on average. Our results suggest that the benefit of explicit abstraction is significant in formally defined logical reasoning settings requiring many reasoning hops, but point to the notion that it is less beneficial for NLP tasks having less formal logical structure.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑