arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2112.09301cs.CLcs.AIcs.SI

Overview of the HASOC Subtrack at FIRE 2021: Hate Speech and Offensive Content Identification in English and Indo-Aryan Languages

University of Hildesheim(希尔德斯海姆大学);LDRP-ITR;University of Duisburg-Essen(杜伊斯堡-埃森大学);Indian Institute of Science(印度科学理工学院);DA-IICT;University of Wolverhampton(伍尔弗汉普顿大学);Rochester Institute of Technology(罗切斯特理工学院);University of Bamberg(班贝格大学);University of Bedfordshire(贝德福德大学);University of Leeds(利兹大学)
Thomas Mandl, Sandip Modha, Gautam Kishore Shahi, Hiren Madhu, Shrey Satapara, Prasenjit Majumder, Johannes Schaefer, Tharindu Ranasinghe, Marcos Zampieri, Durg… 展开作者

Thomas Mandl, Sandip Modha, Gautam Kishore Shahi, Hiren Madhu, Shrey Satapara, Prasenjit Majumder, Johannes Schaefer, Tharindu Ranasinghe, Marcos Zampieri, Durgesh Nandini, Amit Kumar Jaiswal

英文摘要:

The widespread of offensive content online such as hate speech poses a growing societal problem. AI tools are necessary for supporting the moderation process at online platforms. For the evaluation of these identification tools, continuous experimentation with data sets in different languages are necessary. The HASOC track (Hate Speech and Offensive Content Identification) is dedicated to develop benchmark data for this purpose. This paper presents the HASOC subtrack for English, Hindi, and Marathi. The data set was assembled from Twitter. This subtrack has two sub-tasks. Task A is a binary classification problem (Hate and Not Offensive) offered for all three languages. Task B is a fine-grained classification problem for three classes (HATE) Hate speech, OFFENSIVE and PROFANITY offered for English and Hindi. Overall, 652 runs were submitted by 65 teams. The performance of the best classification algorithms for task A are F1 measures 0.91, 0.78 and 0.83 for Marathi, Hindi and English, respectively. This overview presents the tasks and the data development as well as the detailed results. The systems submitted to the competition applied a variety of technologies. The best performing algorithms were mainly variants of transformer architectures.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑