arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2110.05409cs.LGcs.IR
收藏

利用丢弃和解耦打破Softmax瓶颈的顺序推荐系统

Breaking the Softmax Bottleneck for Sequential Recommender Systems with Dropout and Decoupling

Ying-Chen Lin

摘要:

Softmax瓶颈首先在语言建模中被确定为对基于Softmax的模型的表达能力的理论限制。作为最广泛使用的输出概率的方法之一,基于Softmax的模型已经得到了广泛的应用,包括基于会话的推荐系统(SBRS)。基于Softmax的模型由最终线性层顶部的Softmax函数组成。瓶颈已被证明是由于在最后的线性层秩不足,由于其与矩阵分解。在本文中,我们展示了SBRS中Softmax瓶颈的更多方面。与通常的看法相反,过拟合确实发生在最后的线性层,而它通常与复杂网络有关。此外,我们发现在会话序列和候选池之间共享项嵌入的常见技术会产生紧耦合,这也会导致瓶颈。我们提出了一个简单而有效的方法,辍学和解耦(D&D),以减轻这些问题。我们的实验表明,我们的方法显着提高了各种基于Softmax的SBRS算法的准确性。当与其他计算昂贵的方法,如MLP和MoS(Softmax的混合)相比,我们的方法与这些方法相当,有时甚至更好,同时保持与基于Softmax的模型相同的时间复杂度。

英文摘要:

The Softmax bottleneck was first identified in language modeling as a theoretical limit on the expressivity of Softmax-based models. Being one of the most widely-used methods to output probability, Softmax-based models have found a wide range of applications, including session-based recommender systems (SBRSs). Softmax-based models consist of a Softmax function on top of a final linear layer. The bottleneck has been shown to be caused by rank deficiency in the final linear layer due to its connection with matrix factorization. In this paper, we show that there are more aspects to the Softmax bottleneck in SBRSs. Contrary to common beliefs, overfitting does happen in the final linear layer, while it is often associated with complex networks. Furthermore, we identified that the common technique of sharing item embeddings among session sequences and the candidate pool creates a tight-coupling that also contributes to the bottleneck. We propose a simple yet effective method, Dropout and Decoupling (D&D), to alleviate these problems. Our experiments show that our method significantly improves the accuracy of a variety of Softmax-based SBRS algorithms. When compared to other computationally expensive methods, such as MLP and MoS (Mixture of Softmaxes), our method performs on par with and at times even better than those methods, while keeping the same time complexity as Softmax-based models.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑