arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2110.02473cs.LGstat.ML

对比学习在特征学习中的力量:一项理论分析

The Power of Contrast for Feature Learning: A Theoretical Analysis

Stanford University(斯坦福大学);Columbia University(哥伦比亚大学);Rutgers University(罗格斯大学)

Wenlong Ji, Zhun Deng, Ryumei Nakada, James Zou, Linjun Zhang

AI总结:

本文在线性表示设置下理论证明对比学习优于自编码器和生成对抗网络,并分析监督对比学习中标签数据的影响,为对比学习的优越性提供理论支持。

摘要:

对比学习在各种自监督学习任务中取得了最先进的性能,甚至超过了其监督对应方法。尽管经验上取得了成功,但对对比学习优越性的理论理解仍然有限。在本文中,在线性表示设置下,(i)我们可证明地表明,对比学习在特征恢复和域内下游任务方面均优于标准自编码器和生成对抗网络(两种经典的生成式无监督学习方法);(ii)我们还说明了监督对比学习中标记数据的影响。这为最近的发现提供了理论支持,即带有标签的对比学习提高了域内下游任务中学习表示的性能,但可能损害迁移学习的性能。我们通过数值实验验证了我们的理论。

英文摘要:

Contrastive learning has achieved state-of-the-art performance in various self-supervised learning tasks and even outperforms its supervised counterpart. Despite its empirical success, theoretical understanding of the superiority of contrastive learning is still limited. In this paper, under linear representation settings, (i) we provably show that contrastive learning outperforms the standard autoencoders and generative adversarial networks, two classical generative unsupervised learning methods, for both feature recovery and in-domain downstream tasks; (ii) we also illustrate the impact of labeled data in supervised contrastive learning. This provides theoretical support for recent findings that contrastive learning with labels improves the performance of learned representations in the in-domain downstream task, but it can harm the performance in transfer learning. We verify our theory with numerical experiments.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑