选民对风险限制审计的信任感知
Voter Perceptions of Trust in Risk-Limiting Audits
摘要：
风险限制审计（RLA）有望增强公众对选举结果正确性的信心。我们假设情况并非总是如此，部分原因是由于赢家和亚军之间的差距很大，要抽取的选票数量可能太少，以至于选民失去信心。我们对居住在美国的105名参与者进行了用户研究。我们的研究结果证实了这一假设，表明当我们的研究参与者被告知RLA审计的选票数量时，他们感到不那么自信。我们详细阐述了我们的研究结果，并提出建议，为今后使用的RLA。
英文摘要：
Risk-limiting audits (RLAs) are expected to strengthen the public confidence in the correctness of an election outcome. We hypothesize that this is not always the case, in part because for large margins between the winner and the runner-up, the number of ballots to be drawn can be so small that voters lose confidence. We conduct a user study with 105 participants resident in the US. Our findings confirm the hypothesis, showing that our study participants felt less confident when they were told the number of ballots audited for RLAs. We elaborate on our findings and propose recommendations for future use of RLAs.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
