arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2109.07437cs.LGcs.CL
收藏

我们应该进行预培训吗?论最终任务意识训练的替代方案

Should We Be Pre-training? An Argument for End-task Aware Training as an Alternative

Carnegie Mellon University(卡内基梅隆大学);ENS PSL University(巴黎文理研究大学高等师范学院);Determined AI(Determined AI公司)

Lucio M. Dery, Paul Michel, Ameet Talwalkar, Graham Neubig

摘要:

在大多数实际问题的设置中,机器学习从业者提前知道他们希望用辅助任务来推进什么样的最终任务。然而,广泛使用的利用辅助数据的方法,如预训练及其持续预训练变体,是与最终任务无关的:它们很少利用目标任务的知识。我们研究用所述模型的最终任务感知训练来替换预先训练的语言模型的最终任务不可知的继续训练。我们认为,对于足够重要的最终任务,以任务感知的方式利用辅助数据的好处可以证明放弃获得通用的,最终任务不可知的表示与(持续)预训练的传统方法是合理的。在来自两个领域的三个不同的低资源NLP任务上,我们证明了多任务处理最终任务和辅助目标的结果比Gururangan等人广泛使用的任务不可知的持续预训练范式显着更好的下游任务性能。接下来,我们将介绍一种在线元学习算法,该算法学习一组多任务权重,以更好地平衡多个辅助目标,从而进一步提高最终任务的性能和数据效率。

英文摘要:

In most settings of practical concern, machine learning practitioners know in advance what end-task they wish to boost with auxiliary tasks. However, widely used methods for leveraging auxiliary data like pre-training and its continued-pretraining variant are end-task agnostic: they rarely, if ever, exploit knowledge of the target task. We study replacing end-task agnostic continued training of pre-trained language models with end-task aware training of said models. We argue that for sufficiently important end-tasks, the benefits of leveraging auxiliary data in a task-aware fashion can justify forgoing the traditional approach of obtaining generic, end-task agnostic representations as with (continued) pre-training. On three different low-resource NLP tasks from two domains, we demonstrate that multi-tasking the end-task and auxiliary objectives results in significantly better downstream task performance than the widely-used task-agnostic continued pre-training paradigm of Gururangan et al. (2020). We next introduce an online meta-learning algorithm that learns a set of multi-task weights to better balance among our multiple auxiliary objectives, achieving further improvements on end-task performance and data efficiency.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑