arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2109.03490cs.CLq-bio.QM
收藏

性别一致性效应的跨语言差异:来自元分析的证据

Cross-linguistic differences in gender congruency effects: Evidence from meta-analyses

University of Potsdam(波茨坦大学)

Audrey Bürki, Emiel van den Hoven, Niels O. Schiller, Nikolay DImitrov

AI总结:

本文通过元分析检验性别一致性效应的跨语言差异,证实德语/斯拉夫语与罗曼语在同时呈现条件下表现不同,但现有证据尚不足以支持或否定晚期选择假说。

摘要:

已有研究提出,词语为产出而准备的顺序取决于说话者的语言。在产出“小猫”的翻译对等表达时,德语或荷兰语使用者会在产出的相对较早阶段选择带有性别标记的限定词。法语或意大利语使用者则会推迟限定词或形容词的编码,直到名词的语音形式可用。因此,即使这些词语以相同顺序产出(例如德语的 die kleine Katze、法语的 le petit chat),它们也并非以相同顺序进行计划,并且在产出开始前可能需要不同程度的提前规划。早期选择语言与晚期选择语言之间的这一区分,被提出用于解释如下观察:日耳曼语和斯拉夫语使用者(而非罗曼语使用者)在不同性别的干扰词语境中命名图片时速度更慢。本文开展元分析,以首次直接检验这种跨语言差异,并检验晚期选择假说的一项预测。结果证实,当目标词和干扰词同时呈现时,德语/斯拉夫语中存在性别一致性效应,而罗曼语中不存在该效应。这些元分析并不能证实如下假说:在后一类语言中,当干扰词延迟呈现时会出现类似效应。总体而言,这些分析证实了跨语言差异,但也表明,迄今为止现有证据不足以证实或否定将晚期选择假说作为对该差异的解释。我们强调了未来研究的具体方向。

英文摘要:

It has been proposed that the order in which words are prepared for production depends on the speaker's language. When producing the translation equivalent of the small cat, speakers of German or Dutch select the gender-marked determiner at a relatively early stage of production. Speakers of French or Italian postpone the encoding of a determiner or adjective until the phonological form of the noun is available. Hence, even though the words are produced in the same order (e.g., die kleine Katze in German, le petit chat in French), they are not planned in the same order and might require different amounts of advanced planning prior to production onset. This distinction between early and late selection languages was proposed to account for the observation that speakers of Germanic and Slavic languages, but not of Romance languages, are slower to name pictures in the context of a distractor word of a different gender. Meta-analyses are conducted to provide the first direct test of this cross-linguistic difference and to test a prediction of the late selection hypothesis. They confirm the existence of the gender congruency effect in German/Slavic languages and its absence in Romance languages when target and distractor words are presented simultaneously. They do not allow confirming the hypothesis that in the latter languages, a similar effect emerges when the presentation of the distractor is delayed. Overall, these analyses confirm the cross-linguistic difference but show that the evidence available to date is not sufficient to confirm or reject the late selection hypothesis as an explanation of this difference. We highlight specific directions for future research.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑