研究成果共享中最佳实践的多标准优先排序
Towards Multi-Criteria Prioritization of Best Practices in Research Artifact Sharing
摘要：
众所周知，研究成果共享可以加强科学研究的透明度。然而，在缺乏共同的学科特定的准则，工件评估，主观和相互冲突的期望可能会发生，威胁工件质量。在本文中，我们讨论了我们的初步想法，一个框架的基础上，质量管理原则（5W2H），可以帮助建立共同的准则，工件的评估和共享。此外，使用层次分析法，我们讨论了如何研究社区可以共同努力，以帮助指导方针的适当性的研究优先事项。这些组合的方法构成了一个新颖的软件工程研究，可以促进研究软件的可持续性。
英文摘要：
Research artifact sharing is known to strengthen the transparency of scientific studies. However, in the lack of common discipline-specific guidelines for artifacts evaluation, subjective and conflicting expectations may happen and threaten artifact quality. In this paper, we discuss our preliminary ideas for a framework based on quality management principles (5W2H) that can aid in the establishment of common guidelines for artifact evaluation and sharing. Also, using the Analytic Hierarchy Process, we discuss how research communities could join efforts to aid the guidelines' adequacy to research priorities. These combined methodologies constitute a novelty for software engineering research which can foster research software sustainability.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
