arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 2108.09852physics.flu-dyn
收藏

基于最小能量原理的两股撞击射流中液膜形状和厚度预测

The Liquid Sheet Shape and Thickness Predictions in Two Impinging Jets Based on Minimum Energy Principle

A. Kebriaee, A. Abdehkakha, H. Dolatkhahi, S. Kashanj

摘要:

在冲击雾化器中,通过撞击两个相同的射流来产生液体薄片。喷雾厚度是喷雾特性的重要参数之一,迄今为止,理论上已经获得了几种非唯一的解决方案。其中,Hasson和Peck,Ranz和Miller提出的三个理论解是精度方面最可靠的表达式。显然,所有这些独特的解决方案不可能同时是物理的。然而,一个理论上令人满意的解释有各种非唯一的解决方案尚未提出。此外,一个有意义的标准来识别最物理的解决方案是非常可取的。为了解决这一差距,它是假设,一个额外的约束应被认为是在耦合的连续性和动量方程有一个独特的预测液片厚度。通过采用最小能量原理,在液体片中的最小储存能量被认为是实现唯一解和拒绝非物理解的关键约束。由于无粘流假设对液膜是合理有效的,当最小侧表面预测时,最小能量原理满足。为了量化的侧表面面积的片材形状的片材厚度和数值计算的四阶龙格-库塔法的上述三个表达式。利用液体形状,计算并比较了58度、89度和117度三种不同撞击角下的侧表面面积。此外,液体的形状与Shadowgraph技术获得的实验结果进行了直观的比较。综上所述,证明了Hasson和Peck提出的液膜厚度的物理解是最好的。

英文摘要:

In an impingement atomizer, a thin sheet of liquid generates by impinging two identical jets. The thickness is one of the most crucial parameters in quantifying the spray characteristics for which several non-unique solutions have been acquired theoretically, so far. Among all, three theoretical solutions presented by Hasson and Peck, Ranz, and Miller are the most reliable expressions in terms of precision. Apparently, all these distinctive solutions cannot be physical simultaneously. However, a theoretical satisfactory explanation for having various non-unique solutions has not been presented. Moreover, a meaningful criterion to recognize the most physical solution is highly desirable. To address this gap, it is hypothesized that an additional constraint should be considered in couple with the continuity and momentum equations to have a unique prediction for the liquid sheet thickness. By employing the minimum energy principle, the minimum stored energy in the liquid sheet is considered the crucial constraint to achieving a unique solution and rejecting non-physical ones. Since the inviscid flow assumption is reasonably valid for the liquid sheet, the minimum energy principle satisfies when the minimum lateral surface predicts. To quantify the lateral surface area the sheet shape is presented in terms of the sheet thickness and numerically calculated by the fourth-order Runge-Kutta method for the three mentioned expressions. Using the liquid shape, the lateral surface areas are calculated and compared in three different impingement angles of 58, 89, and 117 degrees. In addition, the liquid shapes are visually compared with the experimental results obtained by the Shadowgraph technique. In sum, it is proved that Hasson and Peck presented the most physical solution for the liquid sheet thickness.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑