arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2108.09005stat.ME
收藏

投影二次判别分析

Quadratic Discriminant Analysis by Projection

Ruiyang Wu, Ning Hao

AI总结:

提出一种基于投影的二次判别分析方法,通过估计最优一维子空间处理异方差数据,参数数量与LDA相同,比标准QDA更稳定,适用于中等维度数据。

摘要:

判别分析,包括线性判别分析(LDA)和二次判别分析(QDA),是分类问题中常用的方法。众所周知,LDA在分析异方差数据时是次优的,而QDA是处理这类数据的理想工具。然而,当数据集中的特征数量适中或较高时,QDA的效果不佳,而LDA及其变体由于对维度的鲁棒性往往表现更好。在本工作中,我们提出了一种基于QDA的新颖降维和分类方法。具体而言,我们定义并估计了QDA的最优一维(1D)子空间,这是一种新颖的混合判别分析方法。新方法能够处理数据异方差性,且其参数数量与LDA相同。因此,它比标准QDA更稳定,适用于中等维度的数据。我们证明了该方法的一致性估计性质,并通过模拟和真实数据示例将其与LDA、QDA、正则化判别分析(RDA)及其他几种竞争方法进行了比较。

英文摘要:

Discriminant analysis, including linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), is a popular approach to classification problems. It is well known that LDA is suboptimal to analyze heteroscedastic data, for which QDA would be an ideal tool. However, QDA is less helpful when the number of features in a data set is moderate or high, and LDA and its variants often perform better due to their robustness against dimensionality. In this work, we introduce a new dimension reduction and classification method based on QDA. In particular, we define and estimate the optimal one-dimensional (1D) subspace for QDA, which is a novel hybrid approach to discriminant analysis. The new method can handle data heteroscedasticity with number of parameters equal to that of LDA. Therefore, it is more stable than the standard QDA and works well for data in moderate dimensions. We show an estimation consistency property of our method, and compare it with LDA, QDA, regularized discriminant analysis (RDA) and a few other competitors by simulated and real data examples.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑