关于研究软件的评价：CDUR程序
On the evaluation of research software: the CDUR procedure
摘要：
背景资料：评价研究软件的质量是一个具有挑战性和相关性的问题，科学界尚未充分解决。研究方法：我们的贡献首先定义，准确但足够广泛，研究软件的概念，其作者随后的评价问题的研究，作为一个健全的评估协议的建议的基础：CDUR程序。结果如下：CDUR包括四个步骤，介绍如下：引用，处理正确的RS识别，传播，衡量良好的传播实践，使用，致力于可用性方面的评估，研究，评估科学工作的影响。结论：最后给出了一些结论和建议。研究评价是促进开放科学政策和实践发展的关键。这是我们的信念，研究软件评估是一个基本的步骤，以诱导更好的研究软件的做法，因此，一个更有效的科学的一步。
英文摘要：
Background: Evaluation of the quality of research software is a challenging and relevant issue, still not sufficiently addressed by the scientific community. Methods: Our contribution begins by defining, precisely but widely enough, the notions of research software and of its authors followed by a study of the evaluation issues, as the basis for the proposition of a sound assessment protocol: the CDUR procedure. Results: CDUR comprises four steps introduced as follows: Citation, to deal with correct RS identification, Dissemination, to measure good dissemination practices, Use, devoted to the evaluation of usability aspects, and Research, to assess the impact of the scientific work. Conclusions: Some conclusions and recommendations are finally included. The evaluation of research is the keystone to boost the evolution of the Open Science policies and practices. It is as well our belief that research software evaluation is a fundamental step to induce better research software practices and, thus, a step towards more efficient science.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
