arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2108.00663cs.CLcs.SE
收藏

迁移学习,用于从推文和App Store评论中挖掘功能请求和错误报告

Transfer Learning for Mining Feature Requests and Bug Reports from Tweets and App Store Reviews

Technical University of Munich(慕尼黑工业大学);Qualicen GmbH(Qualicen有限公司);Blekinge Institute of Technology(布莱金厄理工学院);University of Cologne(科隆大学)

Pablo Restrepo Henao, Jannik Fischbach, Dominik Spies, Julian Frattini, Andreas Vogelsang

摘要:

在用户评论中识别功能请求和错误报告对开发团队来说具有很大的潜力。然而,从社交媒体和应用商店自动挖掘RE相关信息具有挑战性,因为(1)大约70%的用户评论包含嘈杂、不相关的信息,(2)用户评论量每天都在增长,使得手动分析变得不可行,(3)用户评论是用不同语言编写的。现有的方法建立在传统的机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL)的基础上,但无法以高召回率和可接受的精度检测特征请求和错误报告,这是该任务所必需的。在本文中,我们探讨了迁移学习(TL)的用户评论分类的潜力。具体来说,我们训练单语言和多语言BERT模型,并与最先进的方法的性能进行比较。我们发现,单语BERT模型在英语应用评论以及英语和意大利语推文的分类中优于现有的基线方法。然而,我们也观察到,重量级TL模型的应用并不一定会带来更好的性能。事实上,我们的多语言BERT模型比传统的ML方法表现更差。

英文摘要:

Identifying feature requests and bug reports in user comments holds great potential for development teams. However, automated mining of RE-related information from social media and app stores is challenging since (1) about 70% of user comments contain noisy, irrelevant information, (2) the amount of user comments grows daily making manual analysis unfeasible, and (3) user comments are written in different languages. Existing approaches build on traditional machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), but fail to detect feature requests and bug reports with high Recall and acceptable Precision which is necessary for this task. In this paper, we investigate the potential of transfer learning (TL) for the classification of user comments. Specifically, we train both monolingual and multilingual BERT models and compare the performance with state-of-the-art methods. We found that monolingual BERT models outperform existing baseline methods in the classification of English App Reviews as well as English and Italian Tweets. However, we also observed that the application of heavyweight TL models does not necessarily lead to better performance. In fact, our multilingual BERT models perform worse than traditional ML methods.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑