arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2107.09648cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
收藏

不同类型的认知能力:为什么Transformers在预测N400幅度方面优于RNN?

Different kinds of cognitive plausibility: why are transformers better than RNNs at predicting N400 amplitude?

University of California, San Diego(加利福尼亚大学圣迭戈分校)

James A. Michaelov, Megan D. Bardolph, Seana Coulson, Benjamin K. Bergen

摘要:

尽管被设计用于性能而不是认知可扩展性,但是已经发现Transformer语言模型在预测用于评估人类语言理解的度量方面比具有其他架构(诸如递归神经网络)的语言模型更好。基于他们预测N400(一种与处理困难相关的神经信号)的能力,我们提出并提供了一种可能的解释的证据-他们的预测以类似于人类语义促进效应的方式受到前面的上下文的影响。

英文摘要:

Despite being designed for performance rather than cognitive plausibility, transformer language models have been found to be better at predicting metrics used to assess human language comprehension than language models with other architectures, such as recurrent neural networks. Based on how well they predict the N400, a neural signal associated with processing difficulty, we propose and provide evidence for one possible explanation - their predictions are affected by the preceding context in a way analogous to the effect of semantic facilitation in humans.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑