arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2106.08686cs.CLcs.SDeess.AS
收藏

声学词嵌入是否捕获了语音相似性?实证研究

Do Acoustic Word Embeddings Capture Phonological Similarity? An Empirical Study

Saarland University(萨尔兰大学)

Badr M. Abdullah, Marius Mosbach, Iuliia Zaitova, Bernd Möbius, Dietrich Klakow

摘要:

深度神经网络的几种变体已经成功地用于构建参数模型,该参数模型将可变持续时间的口语单词段投影到固定大小的向量表示或声学词嵌入(AWE)上。然而,目前还不清楚我们可以在多大程度上依赖新兴的AWE空间中的距离作为对单词形式相似性的估计。在本文中,我们问:在声学嵌入空间的距离与语音相异性?为了回答这个问题,我们实证研究了具有不同神经架构和学习目标的AWE的监督方法的性能。我们训练AWE模型在两种语言(德语和捷克语)的控制设置和评估两个任务的嵌入:单词歧视和语音相似性。我们的实验表明:(1)在最好的情况下,嵌入空间中的距离与语音距离只有适度的相关性,(2)提高单词辨别任务的性能并不一定会产生更好地反映单词语音相似性的模型。我们的研究结果强调了重新思考AWE当前内在评价的必要性。

英文摘要:

Several variants of deep neural networks have been successfully employed for building parametric models that project variable-duration spoken word segments onto fixed-size vector representations, or acoustic word embeddings (AWEs). However, it remains unclear to what degree we can rely on the distance in the emerging AWE space as an estimate of word-form similarity. In this paper, we ask: does the distance in the acoustic embedding space correlate with phonological dissimilarity? To answer this question, we empirically investigate the performance of supervised approaches for AWEs with different neural architectures and learning objectives. We train AWE models in controlled settings for two languages (German and Czech) and evaluate the embeddings on two tasks: word discrimination and phonological similarity. Our experiments show that (1) the distance in the embedding space in the best cases only moderately correlates with phonological distance, and (2) improving the performance on the word discrimination task does not necessarily yield models that better reflect word phonological similarity. Our findings highlight the necessity to rethink the current intrinsic evaluations for AWEs.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑