arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2106.03221cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
收藏

PAC截止日期内的最佳手臂识别

PAC Best Arm Identification Under a Deadline

University of California, Berkeley(加州大学伯克利分校)

Brijen Thananjeyan, Kirthevasan Kandasamy, Ion Stoica, Michael I. Jordan, Ken Goldberg, Joseph E. Gonzalez

摘要:

我们研究了$(ε, δ)$ -PAC最佳手臂识别,其中决策者必须以至少$1 - δ$的概率识别$ε$ -最佳手臂,同时最小化手臂拉动(样本)的数量。关于这一主题的大部分工作都是在顺序设置中进行的,在顺序设置中,对识别这样的手臂所需的时间没有限制;这允许决策者一次拉动一个手臂。在这项工作中,决策者被赋予$T$回合的最后期限,在每一回合中,它可以自适应地选择拉动哪些手臂以及拉动它们多少次;这区分了所做决策的数量(即,时间或轮数)与所获取的样本数(成本)之间的差异。这种情况发生在临床试验中,人们可能需要在最后期限内确定一种有希望的治疗方法,同时最大限度地减少测试对象的数量,或者在基于模拟的研究中,我们可以弹性地增加或减少虚拟机的数量,以进行尽可能多的实验,但需要为所使用的资源时间付费。由于决策者只能做出$T$决策,所以她可能需要相对于顺序算法过度地拉动一些手臂,以便在所有可能的问题上表现良好。我们正式增加了难度,两个硬度的结果表明,不像顺序设置,适应问题的困难的能力是有限的最后期限的限制。我们提出了弹性批量赛车(EBR),一种新的算法,这种设置和约束其样本的复杂性,表明EBR是最佳的硬度结果。我们提出了模拟评估EBR在这种情况下,它优于基线的几个数量级。

英文摘要:

We study $(ε, δ)$-PAC best arm identification, where a decision-maker must identify an $ε$-optimal arm with probability at least $1 - δ$, while minimizing the number of arm pulls (samples). Most of the work on this topic is in the sequential setting, where there is no constraint on the time taken to identify such an arm; this allows the decision-maker to pull one arm at a time. In this work, the decision-maker is given a deadline of $T$ rounds, where, on each round, it can adaptively choose which arms to pull and how many times to pull them; this distinguishes the number of decisions made (i.e., time or number of rounds) from the number of samples acquired (cost). Such situations occur in clinical trials, where one may need to identify a promising treatment under a deadline while minimizing the number of test subjects, or in simulation-based studies run on the cloud, where we can elastically scale up or down the number of virtual machines to conduct as many experiments as we wish, but need to pay for the resource-time used. As the decision-maker can only make $T$ decisions, she may need to pull some arms excessively relative to a sequential algorithm in order to perform well on all possible problems. We formalize this added difficulty with two hardness results that indicate that unlike sequential settings, the ability to adapt to the problem difficulty is constrained by the finite deadline. We propose Elastic Batch Racing (EBR), a novel algorithm for this setting and bound its sample complexity, showing that EBR is optimal with respect to both hardness results. We present simulations evaluating EBR in this setting, where it outperforms baselines by several orders of magnitude.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑