在线考试管理导致学生在多项选择题中选择更多的答案
Online test administration results in students selecting more responses to multiple-choice-multiple-response items
摘要：
多项选择多项回答（MCMR）项目（即，多项选择题，可选择一个以上的答案）可以是一个宝贵的评估工具。像传统的多项选择单回答问题一样，它们很容易得分，但MCMR项目可以通过在单个问题背景下探索多个推理方面来提供更多关于学生思维的信息。在本文中，我们讨论了MCMR项目的性能差异，导致不同的管理方法（纸张与在线）。特别是，我们发现在网上管理的“点击”的趋势：学生选择更多的MCMR项目的反应时，采取电子版的评估。基于这些研究结果，我们建议，在线管理进行比较时，比较MCMR项目的学生成绩只与其他在线管理，而不是纸质管理。这些结果还表明，MCMR项目提供了一个独特的机会，以探讨低风险评估的在线和书面管理的差异。
英文摘要：
Multiple-choice multiple-response (MCMR) items (i.e., multiple-choice questions for which more than one response may be selected) can be a valuable tool for assessment. Like traditional multiple-choice single-response questions, they are easy to score, but MCMR items can provide more information about student thinking by probing multiple reasoning facets in a single problem context. In this paper, we discuss differences in performance on MCMR items that result from differences in administration method (paper vs. online). In particular, we find a tendency for ``clickiness'' in online administration: students choose more responses to MCMR items when taking the electronic version of the assessment. Based on these findings, we recommend that online administration be compared only to other online administrations and not to paper administrations when comparing student results on MCMR items. These results also suggest that MCMR items provide a unique opportunity to probe differences in online and on-paper administration of low-stakes assessments.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
