arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2106.00545cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML

Counterfactual Invariance to Spurious Correlations: Why and How to Pass Stress Tests

Google Research(谷歌研究院);University of Chicago(芝加哥大学)

Victor Veitch, Alexander D'Amour, Steve Yadlowsky, Jacob Eisenstein

英文摘要:

Informally, a 'spurious correlation' is the dependence of a model on some aspect of the input data that an analyst thinks shouldn't matter. In machine learning, these have a know-it-when-you-see-it character; e.g., changing the gender of a sentence's subject changes a sentiment predictor's output. To check for spurious correlations, we can 'stress test' models by perturbing irrelevant parts of input data and seeing if model predictions change. In this paper, we study stress testing using the tools of causal inference. We introduce counterfactual invariance as a formalization of the requirement that changing irrelevant parts of the input shouldn't change model predictions. We connect counterfactual invariance to out-of-domain model performance, and provide practical schemes for learning (approximately) counterfactual invariant predictors (without access to counterfactual examples). It turns out that both the means and implications of counterfactual invariance depend fundamentally on the true underlying causal structure of the data -- in particular, whether the label causes the features or the features cause the label. Distinct causal structures require distinct regularization schemes to induce counterfactual invariance. Similarly, counterfactual invariance implies different domain shift guarantees depending on the underlying causal structure. This theory is supported by empirical results on text classification.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑