arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2105.04880cs.CVcs.DC
收藏

多视图聚类中的一致多重图嵌入

Consistent Multiple Graph Embedding for Multi-View Clustering

Institute of Information Science, Beijing Jiaotong University(北京交通大学信息科学研究所);Beijing Key Laboratory of Advanced Information Science and Network Technology(北京交通大学先进信息科学与网络技术北京重点实验室)

Yiming Wang, Dongxia Chang, Zhiqiang Fu, Yao Zhao

摘要:

基于图的多视图聚类旨在获得跨多个视图的数据划分,近年来受到了相当大的关注。虽然基于图的多视图聚类已经取得了很大的努力,它仍然是一个挑战,从不同的视图融合的特征,学习一个共同的表示聚类。在本文中,我们提出了一个新的一致性多图嵌入聚类框架(CMGEC)。具体而言,多图自动编码器(M-GAE)的设计灵活地编码的互补信息的多视图数据使用多图注意力融合编码器。为了指导学习的公共表示保持在每个视图中的相邻特征的相似性,多视图互信息最大化模块(MMIM)被引入。此外,一个图融合网络(GFN)的设计,以探索从不同的视图之间的关系,并提供一个共同的共识图M-GAE所需的。通过联合训练这些模型,可以获得共同的潜在表示,编码更多的互补信息,从多个视图和更全面地描绘数据。在三种多视图数据集上的实验表明,CMGEC优于现有的聚类方法。

英文摘要:

Graph-based multi-view clustering aiming to obtain a partition of data across multiple views, has received considerable attention in recent years. Although great efforts have been made for graph-based multi-view clustering, it remains a challenge to fuse characteristics from various views to learn a common representation for clustering. In this paper, we propose a novel Consistent Multiple Graph Embedding Clustering framework(CMGEC). Specifically, a multiple graph auto-encoder(M-GAE) is designed to flexibly encode the complementary information of multi-view data using a multi-graph attention fusion encoder. To guide the learned common representation maintaining the similarity of the neighboring characteristics in each view, a Multi-view Mutual Information Maximization module(MMIM) is introduced. Furthermore, a graph fusion network(GFN) is devised to explore the relationship among graphs from different views and provide a common consensus graph needed in M-GAE. By jointly training these models, the common latent representation can be obtained which encodes more complementary information from multiple views and depicts data more comprehensively. Experiments on three types of multi-view datasets demonstrate CMGEC outperforms the state-of-the-art clustering methods.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑