arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2104.14403cs.LGcs.CV
收藏

特征属性方法是否正确地对特征进行属性化?

Do Feature Attribution Methods Correctly Attribute Features?

MIT CSAIL(麻省理工学院计算机科学与人工智能实验室);Microsoft Research(微软研究院)

Yilun Zhou, Serena Booth, Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Julie Shah

摘要:

特征属性方法在可解释的机器学习中很受欢迎。这些方法计算每个输入特征的属性以表示其重要性,但对“属性”的定义没有共识,导致许多竞争方法几乎没有系统的评估,特别是由于缺乏地面实况属性而变得复杂。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一个数据集修改程序,以诱导这样的地面真相。使用这个过程中,我们评估三种常见的方法:显着性图,理由,和注意。我们发现了一些不足之处,并为越来越多的证据增加了新的视角,这些证据质疑这些方法在野外数据集上应用的正确性和可靠性。我们进一步讨论了可能的补救途径,并建议在部署前对地面实况进行测试的新归因方法。代码可在https://github.com/YilunZhou/feature-attribution-evaluation上获得

英文摘要:

Feature attribution methods are popular in interpretable machine learning. These methods compute the attribution of each input feature to represent its importance, but there is no consensus on the definition of "attribution", leading to many competing methods with little systematic evaluation, complicated in particular by the lack of ground truth attribution. To address this, we propose a dataset modification procedure to induce such ground truth. Using this procedure, we evaluate three common methods: saliency maps, rationales, and attentions. We identify several deficiencies and add new perspectives to the growing body of evidence questioning the correctness and reliability of these methods applied on datasets in the wild. We further discuss possible avenues for remedy and recommend new attribution methods to be tested against ground truth before deployment. The code is available at https://github.com/YilunZhou/feature-attribution-evaluation

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑