arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2104.04448cs.LGcs.CVstat.ML

Relating Adversarially Robust Generalization to Flat Minima

Max Planck Institute for Informatics(马克斯·普朗克信息学研究所);Saarland Informatics Campus(萨尔兰信息学园区);University of Tübingen(图宾根大学)

David Stutz, Matthias Hein, Bernt Schiele

英文摘要:

Adversarial training (AT) has become the de-facto standard to obtain models robust against adversarial examples. However, AT exhibits severe robust overfitting: cross-entropy loss on adversarial examples, so-called robust loss, decreases continuously on training examples, while eventually increasing on test examples. In practice, this leads to poor robust generalization, i.e., adversarial robustness does not generalize well to new examples. In this paper, we study the relationship between robust generalization and flatness of the robust loss landscape in weight space, i.e., whether robust loss changes significantly when perturbing weights. To this end, we propose average- and worst-case metrics to measure flatness in the robust loss landscape and show a correlation between good robust generalization and flatness. For example, throughout training, flatness reduces significantly during overfitting such that early stopping effectively finds flatter minima in the robust loss landscape. Similarly, AT variants achieving higher adversarial robustness also correspond to flatter minima. This holds for many popular choices, e.g., AT-AWP, TRADES, MART, AT with self-supervision or additional unlabeled examples, as well as simple regularization techniques, e.g., AutoAugment, weight decay or label noise. For fair comparison across these approaches, our flatness measures are specifically designed to be scale-invariant and we conduct extensive experiments to validate our findings.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑