arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2104.01736cs.CC
收藏

A Critique of Keum-Bae Cho's Proof that $\mathrm{P} \subsetneq \mathrm{NP}$

Benjamin Carleton, Michael C. Chavrimootoo, Conor Taliancich

英文摘要:

In this paper we critique Keum-Bae Cho's proof that $\mathrm{P} \subsetneq \mathrm{NP}$. This proof relates instances of 3-SAT to indistinguishable binomial decision trees and claims that no polynomial-time algorithm can solve 3-SAT instances represented by these trees. We argue that their proof fails to justify a crucial step, and so the proof does not establish that $\mathrm{P} \subsetneq \mathrm{NP}$.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑