arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2104.01231cs.LGcs.AIcs.CV
收藏

用于鲁棒性与不确定性校准的多样化高斯噪声一致性正则化

Diverse Gaussian Noise Consistency Regularization for Robustness and Uncertainty Calibration

MIT Lincoln Laboratory(麻省理工学院林肯实验室);Boston University(波士顿大学)

Theodoros Tsiligkaridis, Athanasios Tsiligkaridis

AI总结:

本文提出多样化高斯噪声一致性正则化方法,通过局部损失景观分析推导理论界,在保持干净样本准确率的同时显著提升图像分类器对多种损坏的鲁棒性与不确定性校准性能。

摘要:

深度神经网络在训练分布与测试分布一致时能够取得较高的预测准确率。然而在实际中,会出现各种类型的损坏,偏离这一设定并导致严重的性能下降。目前针对不可预见领域偏移下的泛化问题所提出的方法较少。特别是,数字噪声损坏在图像采集阶段实际中经常出现,并对现有方法构成显著挑战。本文提出了一种多样化高斯噪声一致性正则化方法,用于在多种损坏条件下提高图像分类器的鲁棒性,同时仍保持较高的干净样本准确率。我们利用局部损失景观分析推导出界,以激励并理解高斯噪声一致性正则化的行为。在多个基准上,与对抗训练及其他强多样化数据增强基线相比,我们的方法对不可预见噪声损坏的鲁棒性提高了4.2%至18.4%。此外,当与最先进的多样化数据增强方法结合时,该方法对所有常见损坏(天气、数字、模糊、噪声)的鲁棒性和不确定性校准分别提高了3.7%和5.5%。

英文摘要:

Deep neural networks achieve high prediction accuracy when the train and test distributions coincide. In practice though, various types of corruptions occur which deviate from this setup and cause severe performance degradations. Few methods have been proposed to address generalization in the presence of unforeseen domain shifts. In particular, digital noise corruptions arise commonly in practice during the image acquisition stage and present a significant challenge for current methods. In this paper, we propose a diverse Gaussian noise consistency regularization method for improving robustness of image classifiers under a variety of corruptions while still maintaining high clean accuracy. We derive bounds to motivate and understand the behavior of our Gaussian noise consistency regularization using a local loss landscape analysis. Our approach improves robustness against unforeseen noise corruptions by 4.2-18.4% over adversarial training and other strong diverse data augmentation baselines across several benchmarks. Furthermore, it improves robustness and uncertainty calibration by 3.7% and 5.5%, respectively, against all common corruptions (weather, digital, blur, noise) when combined with state-of-the-art diverse data augmentations.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑