arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2104.01167cs.RO
收藏

用于插入的Tactile-RL:推广到未知几何形状的对象

Tactile-RL for Insertion: Generalization to Objects of Unknown Geometry

Massachusetts Institute of Technology(麻省理工学院);Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories(三菱电机研究实验室)

Siyuan Dong, Devesh K. Jha, Diego Romeres, Sangwoon Kim, Daniel Nikovski, Alberto Rodriguez

摘要:

对象插入是典型的接触丰富的操作任务。这项任务仍然具有挑战性,特别是当考虑到未知几何形状的一般对象时,这大大限制了理解对象与环境之间的接触配置的能力。我们研究的问题,对齐的对象和环境与基于搜索的反馈插入政策。插入过程被建模为一个情节的政策,迭代之间的插入尝试,然后姿势校正。我们探索不同的机制来学习这样的政策的基础上强化学习。本文的主要贡献是证明了可以学习在不同对象几何形状中推广的触觉插入策略,以及学习代理的关键设计选择的消融研究:1)学习方案的类型:监督与强化学习; 2)学习时间表的类型:无指导与课程学习; 3)传感模态的类型:力/扭矩(F/T)与触觉;以及4)触觉表示的类型:触觉RGB与触觉流。我们表明,暴露于4个训练对象的学习代理的最佳配置(RL +课程+触觉流)产生插入策略,插入4个新对象,成功率超过85.0%,并在3~4次尝试。F/T和触觉感知之间的比较表明,虽然基于F/T的策略学习效率更高,但基于触觉的策略提供了更好的泛化能力。

英文摘要:

Object insertion is a classic contact-rich manipulation task. The task remains challenging, especially when considering general objects of unknown geometry, which significantly limits the ability to understand the contact configuration between the object and the environment. We study the problem of aligning the object and environment with a tactile-based feedback insertion policy. The insertion process is modeled as an episodic policy that iterates between insertion attempts followed by pose corrections. We explore different mechanisms to learn such a policy based on Reinforcement Learning. The key contribution of this paper is to demonstrate that it is possible to learn a tactile insertion policy that generalizes across different object geometries, and an ablation study of the key design choices for the learning agent: 1) the type of learning scheme: supervised vs. reinforcement learning; 2) the type of learning schedule: unguided vs. curriculum learning; 3) the type of sensing modality: force/torque (F/T) vs. tactile; and 4) the type of tactile representation: tactile RGB vs. tactile flow. We show that the optimal configuration of the learning agent (RL + curriculum + tactile flow) exposed to 4 training objects yields an insertion policy that inserts 4 novel objects with over 85.0% success rate and within 3~4 attempts. Comparisons between F/T and tactile sensing, shows that while an F/T-based policy learns more efficiently, a tactile-based policy provides better generalization.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑