arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2103.12692cs.LGmath.OCstat.ML

Benign Overfitting of Constant-Stepsize SGD for Linear Regression

University of California, Los Angeles(加州大学洛杉矶分校);Johns Hopkins University(约翰斯·霍普金斯大学);University of Washington(华盛顿大学);Microsoft Research(微软研究院)

Difan Zou, Jingfeng Wu, Vladimir Braverman, Quanquan Gu, Sham M. Kakade

英文摘要:

There is an increasing realization that algorithmic inductive biases are central in preventing overfitting; empirically, we often see a benign overfitting phenomenon in overparameterized settings for natural learning algorithms, such as stochastic gradient descent (SGD), where little to no explicit regularization has been employed. This work considers this issue in arguably the most basic setting: constant-stepsize SGD (with iterate averaging or tail averaging) for linear regression in the overparameterized regime. Our main result provides a sharp excess risk bound, stated in terms of the full eigenspectrum of the data covariance matrix, that reveals a bias-variance decomposition characterizing when generalization is possible: (i) the variance bound is characterized in terms of an effective dimension (specific for SGD) and (ii) the bias bound provides a sharp geometric characterization in terms of the location of the initial iterate (and how it aligns with the data covariance matrix). More specifically, for SGD with iterate averaging, we demonstrate the sharpness of the established excess risk bound by proving a matching lower bound (up to constant factors). For SGD with tail averaging, we show its advantage over SGD with iterate averaging by proving a better excess risk bound together with a nearly matching lower bound. Moreover, we reflect on a number of notable differences between the algorithmic regularization afforded by (unregularized) SGD in comparison to ordinary least squares (minimum-norm interpolation) and ridge regression. Experimental results on synthetic data corroborate our theoretical findings.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑