arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2103.04982cs.MAcs.AIcs.GT
收藏

人类群体声誉与合作的多智能体强化学习模型

A multi-agent reinforcement learning model of reputation and cooperation in human groups

DeepMind(深度思维);UCL(伦敦大学学院)

Kevin R. McKee, Edward Hughes, Tina O. Zhu, Martin J. Chadwick, Raphael Koster, Antonio Garcia Castaneda, Charlie Beattie, Thore Graepel, Matt Botvinick, Joel Z. Leibo

摘要:

集体行动要求个人有效地协调合作的程度、地点和时间。实验室实验已经广泛地探索了这个过程的第一部分,证明了各种社会认知机制会影响个人选择在团队努力中投入多少。然而,实验研究一直无法阐明社会认知机制如何影响集体行动的地点和时间。我们建立并测试了人类行为的计算模型清理,社会困境的任务流行的多智能体强化学习研究。我们表明,人类团体有效地合作,清理时,他们可以识别组成员和跟踪声誉随着时间的推移,但未能组织在匿名的条件下。信誉的多智能体强化学习模型在可识别性和匿名性条件下的合作表现出相同的差异。此外,该模型准确地预测了空间和时间模式的群体行为:在这个公共产品的困境,声誉的内在动机催化发展的非领土,话轮转换策略,以协调集体行动。

英文摘要:

Collective action demands that individuals efficiently coordinate how much, where, and when to cooperate. Laboratory experiments have extensively explored the first part of this process, demonstrating that a variety of social-cognitive mechanisms influence how much individuals choose to invest in group efforts. However, experimental research has been unable to shed light on how social cognitive mechanisms contribute to the where and when of collective action. We build and test a computational model of human behavior in Clean Up, a social dilemma task popular in multi-agent reinforcement learning research. We show that human groups effectively cooperate in Clean Up when they can identify group members and track reputations over time, but fail to organize under conditions of anonymity. A multi-agent reinforcement learning model of reputation demonstrates the same difference in cooperation under conditions of identifiability and anonymity. In addition, the model accurately predicts spatial and temporal patterns of group behavior: in this public goods dilemma, the intrinsic motivation for reputation catalyzes the development of a non-territorial, turn-taking strategy to coordinate collective action.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑