arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2103.03417cs.CVcs.LG

Measuring Model Biases in the Absence of Ground Truth

Google(谷歌);Ulm University(乌尔姆大学);Ethical AI LLC(Ethical AI有限责任公司)

Osman Aka, Ken Burke, Alex Bäuerle, Christina Greer, Margaret Mitchell

英文摘要:

The measurement of bias in machine learning often focuses on model performance across identity subgroups (such as man and woman) with respect to groundtruth labels. However, these methods do not directly measure the associations that a model may have learned, for example between labels and identity subgroups. Further, measuring a model's bias requires a fully annotated evaluation dataset which may not be easily available in practice. We present an elegant mathematical solution that tackles both issues simultaneously, using image classification as a working example. By treating a classification model's predictions for a given image as a set of labels analogous to a bag of words, we rank the biases that a model has learned with respect to different identity labels. We use (man, woman) as a concrete example of an identity label set (although this set need not be binary), and present rankings for the labels that are most biased towards one identity or the other. We demonstrate how the statistical properties of different association metrics can lead to different rankings of the most "gender biased" labels, and conclude that normalized pointwise mutual information (nPMI) is most useful in practice. Finally, we announce an open-sourced nPMI visualization tool using TensorBoard.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑