arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2103.01924cs.CVcs.CY
收藏

面具人脸识别:人类与机器

Masked Face Recognition: Human vs. Machine

Fraunhofer Institute for Computer Graphics Research IGD(弗劳恩霍夫计算机图形学研究所IGD);TU Darmstadt(达姆施塔特工业大学)

Naser Damer, Fadi Boutros, Marius Süßmilch, Meiling Fang, Florian Kirchbuchner, Arjan Kuijper

摘要:

最近的COVID-19大流行使人们更加关注卫生和非接触式身份验证方法。然而,疫情导致口罩的广泛使用,这对控制疫情至关重要。在协作环境中戴口罩对人脸识别(FR)的影响是目前敏感但研究不足的问题。最近的报告已经解决了这一问题,通过评估掩蔽探针的自动FR解决方案的性能的影响。然而,这种解决方案在某些过程中可能会失败,导致由人类专家执行验证任务。这项工作提供了一个联合评估和深入分析的人脸验证性能的人类专家相比,最先进的自动FR解决方案。这涉及人类专家的广泛评估和4种自动识别解决方案。这项研究的结论是,在人类和机器的验证行为之间的相关性的不同方面,有一套带回家的消息。

英文摘要:

The recent COVID-19 pandemic has increased the focus on hygienic and contactless identity verification methods. However, the pandemic led to the wide use of face masks, essential to keep the pandemic under control. The effect of wearing a mask on face recognition (FR) in a collaborative environment is a currently sensitive yet understudied issue. Recent reports have tackled this by evaluating the masked probe effect on the performance of automatic FR solutions. However, such solutions can fail in certain processes, leading to performing the verification task by a human expert. This work provides a joint evaluation and in-depth analyses of the face verification performance of human experts in comparison to state-of-the-art automatic FR solutions. This involves an extensive evaluation by human experts and 4 automatic recognition solutions. The study concludes with a set of take-home messages on different aspects of the correlation between the verification behavior of humans and machines.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑