可竞争性的概念化：对竞争性决策的观点
Conceptualising Contestability: Perspectives on Contesting Algorithmic Decisions
摘要：
随着算法系统在高风险决策中的使用增加，质疑算法决策的能力被认为是个人的重要保障。然而，关于算法决策需要什么样的“稳定性”-对决策提出异议的能力-几乎没有指导。最近的研究提出了算法决策中的稳定性的不同概念。我们通过描述和分析响应澳大利亚提出的“人工智能道德框架”的个人和组织的观点来促进这一不断增长的工作，这是第一个将“可持续性”作为核心道德原则的框架。我们的研究结果表明，虽然不稳定性的性质是有争议的，它被视为一种保护个人的方式，它类似于人类决策的不稳定性。我们反思并讨论这些发现的影响。
英文摘要：
As the use of algorithmic systems in high-stakes decision-making increases, the ability to contest algorithmic decisions is being recognised as an important safeguard for individuals. Yet, there is little guidance on what `contestability'--the ability to contest decisions--in relation to algorithmic decision-making requires. Recent research presents different conceptualisations of contestability in algorithmic decision-making. We contribute to this growing body of work by describing and analysing the perspectives of people and organisations who made submissions in response to Australia's proposed `AI Ethics Framework', the first framework of its kind to include `contestability' as a core ethical principle. Our findings reveal that while the nature of contestability is disputed, it is seen as a way to protect individuals, and it resembles contestability in relation to human decision-making. We reflect on and discuss the implications of these findings.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
