arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2102.10055cs.CV
收藏

胶囊网络的有效投票攻击

Effective and Efficient Vote Attack on Capsule Networks

University of Munich(慕尼黑大学);the Chinese University of Hong Kong Shenzhen(香港中文大学(深圳))

Jindong Gu, Baoyuan Wu, Volker Tresp

摘要:

标准的卷积神经网络(CNN)很容易被带有微小的准不可感知的人工扰动的图像所欺骗。作为CNN的替代方案,最近提出的胶囊网络(CapsNets)被证明比流行的攻击协议下的CNN更强大的白盒攻击。此外,CapsNets的类条件重建部分也用于检测对抗性示例。在这项工作中,我们研究了CapsNets的对抗鲁棒性,特别是当输出胶囊受到攻击时,CapsNets的内部工作如何改变。第一个观察结果是,对抗性示例通过操纵来自主胶囊的投票来误导CapsNets。另一个观察结果是,当我们直接应用为CNN设计的多步攻击方法来攻击CapsNet时,由于计算昂贵的路由机制,计算成本很高。受这两个观察的启发,我们提出了一种新的投票攻击,我们直接攻击CapsNet的投票。我们的投票攻击不仅是有效的,而且绕过路由过程的效率。此外,我们将我们的投票攻击检测感知攻击范式,它可以成功地绕过类条件重建的检测方法。大量的实验表明,我们的投票攻击CapsNets的优越的攻击性能。

英文摘要:

Standard Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) can be easily fooled by images with small quasi-imperceptible artificial perturbations. As alternatives to CNNs, the recently proposed Capsule Networks (CapsNets) are shown to be more robust to white-box attacks than CNNs under popular attack protocols. Besides, the class-conditional reconstruction part of CapsNets is also used to detect adversarial examples. In this work, we investigate the adversarial robustness of CapsNets, especially how the inner workings of CapsNets change when the output capsules are attacked. The first observation is that adversarial examples misled CapsNets by manipulating the votes from primary capsules. Another observation is the high computational cost, when we directly apply multi-step attack methods designed for CNNs to attack CapsNets, due to the computationally expensive routing mechanism. Motivated by these two observations, we propose a novel vote attack where we attack votes of CapsNets directly. Our vote attack is not only effective but also efficient by circumventing the routing process. Furthermore, we integrate our vote attack into the detection-aware attack paradigm, which can successfully bypass the class-conditional reconstruction based detection method. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superior attack performance of our vote attack on CapsNets.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑