arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 2102.08933cs.AIcs.CY
收藏

一个客观的实验室协议,用于评估非人类系统对人类认知的认知

An Objective Laboratory Protocol for Evaluating Cognition of Non-Human Systems Against Human Cognition

David J. Jilk

摘要:

在本文中,我描述并减少到实践的一个客观的协议,用于评估在实验室环境中对人类认知的非人类系统的认知能力。这一点很重要,因为一个具有与人类相当的认知能力的非人类系统的存在,可能会使曾经的安全和伦理哲学问题变得直接和紧迫。过去设计评估方法的尝试,如图灵测试和许多其他方法,都没有满足这一需求;它们中的大多数要么强调人类认知的单一方面,要么强调单一的智力理论,未能抓住人类的普遍性和新颖性,要么要求在物理世界中取得成功。该协议是广泛的贝叶斯,因为它的主要输出是一个置信度统计的索赔。此外,它还提供了对特定系统在哪些领域以及在多大程度上缺乏人类认知的见解,这有助于推动进一步的进展或预防措施。

英文摘要:

In this paper I describe and reduce to practice an objective protocol for evaluating the cognitive capabilities of a non-human system against human cognition in a laboratory environment. This is important because the existence of a non-human system with cognitive capabilities comparable to those of humans might make once-philosophical questions of safety and ethics immediate and urgent. Past attempts to devise evaluation methods, such as the Turing Test and many others, have not met this need; most of them either emphasize a single aspect of human cognition or a single theory of intelligence, fail to capture the human capacity for generality and novelty, or require success in the physical world. The protocol is broadly Bayesian, in that its primary output is a confidence statistic in relation to a claim. Further, it provides insight into the areas where and to what extent a particular system falls short of human cognition, which can help to drive further progress or precautions.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑