arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2102.07536cs.AIecon.GNq-fin.EC
收藏

人工智能生成建议的腐败力量

The corruptive force of AI-generated advice

University of Amsterdam(阿姆斯特丹大学);Max Planck Institute for Human Development(马克斯·普朗克人类发展研究所);WHU - Otto Beisheim School of Management(WHU - 奥托贝森管理学院);University of Cologne(科隆大学)

Margarita Leib, Nils C. Köbis, Rainer Michael Rilke, Marloes Hagens, Bernd Irlenbusch

摘要:

人工智能(AI)越来越成为人们生活中值得信赖的顾问。如果人工智能说服人们为了利润而违反道德规则,就会出现新的担忧。通过一个大规模的行为实验(N = 1,572),我们测试了人工智能生成的建议是否会腐蚀人们。我们进一步测试了人工智能存在的透明度(一种常见的政策)是否减轻了人工智能生成建议的潜在危害。使用自然语言处理算法GPT-2,我们生成了诚实促进和不诚实促进建议。参与者在参与一项他们可以为了利润而撒谎的任务之前阅读一种类型的建议。通过测试人类行为与实际AI输出的交互,我们首次提供了关于AI作为顾问角色的行为见解。结果显示,人工智能生成的建议会腐蚀人们,即使他们知道建议的来源。事实上,人工智能的腐败力量和人类一样强大。

英文摘要:

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly becoming a trusted advisor in people's lives. A new concern arises if AI persuades people to break ethical rules for profit. Employing a large-scale behavioural experiment (N = 1,572), we test whether AI-generated advice can corrupt people. We further test whether transparency about AI presence, a commonly proposed policy, mitigates potential harm of AI-generated advice. Using the Natural Language Processing algorithm, GPT-2, we generated honesty-promoting and dishonesty-promoting advice. Participants read one type of advice before engaging in a task in which they could lie for profit. Testing human behaviour in interaction with actual AI outputs, we provide first behavioural insights into the role of AI as an advisor. Results reveal that AI-generated advice corrupts people, even when they know the source of the advice. In fact, AI's corrupting force is as strong as humans'.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑