arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2102.05281cs.CL
收藏

生物医学问答:方法综述与挑战

Biomedical Question Answering: A Survey of Approaches and Challenges

Tsinghua University(清华大学);Alibaba Group(阿里巴巴集团);Indiana University Bloomington(印第安纳大学伯明顿分校)

Qiao Jin, Zheng Yuan, Guangzhi Xiong, Qianlan Yu, Huaiyuan Ying, Chuanqi Tan, Mosha Chen, Songfang Huang, Xiaozhong Liu, Sheng Yu

AI总结:

本文综述了生物医学问答的5类方法、相关数据集与代表性工作,分析了系统尚未成熟的原因及关键挑战,并展望了未来研究方向。

摘要:

自动问答(QA)已在搜索引擎和聊天机器人等多个领域得到成功应用。生物医学问答(BQA)作为一项新兴的问答任务,能够实现有效感知、获取和理解复杂生物医学知识的创新应用。在过去二十年中,BQA取得了巨大发展,我们将其归纳为5种不同的方法:经典方法、信息检索方法、机器阅读理解方法、知识库方法和问题蕴含方法。在本综述中,我们详细介绍了每种BQA方法的可用数据集和代表性方法。尽管取得了这些进展,BQA系统仍不成熟,在现实场景中很少被使用。我们识别并刻画了可能导致这一问题的BQA中的几个关键挑战,并讨论了一些值得探索的潜在未来方向。

英文摘要:

Automatic Question Answering (QA) has been successfully applied in various domains such as search engines and chatbots. Biomedical QA (BQA), as an emerging QA task, enables innovative applications to effectively perceive, access and understand complex biomedical knowledge. There have been tremendous developments of BQA in the past two decades, which we classify into 5 distinctive approaches: classic, information retrieval, machine reading comprehension, knowledge base and question entailment approaches. In this survey, we introduce available datasets and representative methods of each BQA approach in detail. Despite the developments, BQA systems are still immature and rarely used in real-life settings. We identify and characterize several key challenges in BQA that might lead to this issue, and discuss some potential future directions to explore.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑