基于纸质卡片与基于应用的疫苗凭证：比较
Paper card-based vs application-based vaccine credentials: a comparison
摘要：
在这份早期草案中，我们概述了基于纸质卡片的疫苗证书系统和基于应用程序的疫苗证书系统实施的相似性和差异。疫苗证书的主要目标是规范进入并确保密集的公共场所和公共场所内的个人安全。这对于遏制新型冠状病毒在密集公共场所的快速传播至关重要，因为一个人就可以感染人群中的大多数人。疫苗证书还可以提供个人的Covid-19疫苗接种史和不良症状反应史等信息，以判断其对密集公共场所和公共场所内个人整体健康的潜在影响。在完成比较后，我们相信基于卡的实施将有利于社会经济流动性较低，资源有限和行政管理停滞的地区。另一方面，基于应用程序的实施将使互联网接入公平和技术差距较小的地区受益。我们还认为，这两个认证系统的互操作系统将最适合拥有大量工人阶级人口和密集住房群的地区。
英文摘要：
In this early draft, we provide an overview on similarities and differences in the implementation of a paper card-based vaccine credential system and an app-based vaccine credential system. A vaccine credential's primary goal is to regulate entry and ensure safety of individuals within densely packed public locations and workspaces. This is critical for containing the rapid spread of Covid-19 in densely packed public locations since a single individual can infect a large majority of people in a crowd. A vaccine credential can also provide information such as an individual's Covid-19 vaccination history and adverse symptom reaction history to judge their potential impact on the overall health of individuals within densely packed public locations and workspaces. After completing the comparisons, we believe a card-based implementation will benefit regions with less socioeconomic mobility, limited resources, and stagnant administrations. An app-based implementation on the other hand will benefit regions with equitable internet access and lower technological divide. We also believe an interoperable system of both credential systems will work best for regions with enormous working-class populations and dense housing clusters.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
