促进公平的提议者，公平的回应者或两者兼而有之？空间最后通牒博弈中的成本有效干扰
Promoting Fair Proposers, Fair Responders or Both? Cost-Efficient Interference in the Spatial Ultimatum Game
摘要：
机构和投资者面临着不断的挑战，即如何准确地决策和预测他们应该如何最好地分配他们的捐赠。以最小的成本实现最佳结果的问题已经被广泛研究，并使用几种方法解决。然而，这些著作通常没有解决外部当事方如何能够针对不同类型的公平行为，或者没有考虑到有限的信息如何能够塑造这种复杂的相互作用。在这里，我们考虑了著名的最后通牒游戏在空间环境中，并提出了一个层次的干扰机制的基础上提供给外部决策者和所需的公平标准的信息量。我们的分析表明，在宏观层面上监测人口需要更严格的信息收集，以获得最佳的结果，当地的观察可以调解这一要求。此外，我们还确定了个人必须满足的条件，才有资格进行投资，以避免不必要的支出。我们进一步探讨了不同的突变或行为探索率对投资策略的选择和投资者的总累积成本的影响。总的来说，我们的分析提供了新的见解，有效的物流成本效益的促进社会公平。最后，我们讨论了我们的研究结果和以前的工作做PD之间的差异，并提出我们的建议，促进公平的外部决策者。
英文摘要：
Institutions and investors face the constant challenge of making accurate decisions and predictions regarding how best they should distribute their endowments. The problem of achieving an optimal outcome at minimal cost has been extensively studied and resolved using several heuristics. However, these works usually fail to address how an external party can target different types of fair behaviour or do not take into account how limited information can shape this complex interplay. Here, we consider the well-known Ultimatum game in a spatial setting and propose a hierarchy of interference mechanisms based on the amount of information available to an external decision-maker and desired standards of fairness. Our analysis reveals that monitoring the population at a macroscopic level requires more strict information gathering in order to obtain an optimal outcome and that local observations can mediate this requirement. Moreover, we identify the conditions which must be met for an individual to be eligible for investment in order to avoid unnecessary spending. We further explore the effects of varying mutation or behavioural exploration rates on the choice of investment strategy and total accumulated costs to the investor. Overall, our analysis provides new insights about efficient heuristics for cost-efficient promotion of fairness in societies. Finally, we discuss the differences between our findings and previous work done on the PD and present our suggestions for promoting fairness as an external decision-maker.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
