arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2102.01066cs.CV
收藏

Evaluating Large-Vocabulary Object Detectors: The Devil is in the Details

Carnegie Mellon University(卡内基梅隆大学);Facebook AI Research (FAIR)(脸书人工智能研究院)

Achal Dave, Piotr Dollár, Deva Ramanan, Alexander Kirillov, Ross Girshick

英文摘要:

By design, average precision (AP) for object detection aims to treat all classes independently: AP is computed independently per category and averaged. On one hand, this is desirable as it treats all classes equally. On the other hand, it ignores cross-category confidence calibration, a key property in real-world use cases. Unfortunately, under important conditions (i.e., large vocabulary, high instance counts) the default implementation of AP is neither category independent, nor does it directly reward properly calibrated detectors. In fact, we show that on LVIS the default implementation produces a gameable metric, where a simple, un-intuitive re-ranking policy can improve AP by a large margin. To address these limitations, we introduce two complementary metrics. First, we present a simple fix to the default AP implementation, ensuring that it is independent across categories as originally intended. We benchmark recent LVIS detection advances and find that many reported gains do not translate to improvements under our new evaluation, suggesting recent improvements may arise from difficult to interpret changes to cross-category rankings. Given the importance of reliably benchmarking cross-category rankings, we consider a pooled version of AP (AP-Pool) that rewards properly calibrated detectors by directly comparing cross-category rankings. Finally, we revisit classical approaches for calibration and find that explicitly calibrating detectors improves state-of-the-art on AP-Pool by 1.7 points

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑